AI Photography Training

AI Photography Training

Exclusive Content

GPT-5 for Photographers: A Step Forward or Just Another Tool?

This is the first installment in a five-part series testing and comparing the leading contenders as an AI-based photo editing platform: ChatGPT-5, Flux.1 Kontext, and Midjourney's Retexture.

George Aiello's avatar
George Aiello
Aug 13, 2025
∙ Paid
1
1
Share

For photographers, every new AI release brings the same question: Is this just hype, or can it actually help me make better images?

OpenAI’s newly released GPT-5 is their latest multimodal model, meaning it can work with text, images, and more, and it’s being promoted as more precise and capable than its predecessors, namely GPT-4o, which was pretty good. But how much of that matters to working photographers?

What GPT-5 Claims It Brings to the Table

I decided to start by asking GPT-5 itself:

Prompt: “How might GPT-5 benefit photographers over GPT-4o? I want the pros and cons from a photographer's perspective.” Here’s what it said…

Compared to GPT-4o, GPT-5 claims several upgrades that could matter if you care about composition, realism, and staying true to your photographic style:

  • Higher fidelity in fine details — Petal edges, fabric textures, and hair strands survive transformations with less loss.

  • Better understanding of photographic language — Requests like “increase background blur” or “maintain golden hour warmth” are interpreted more accurately.

  • Improved spatial reasoning — Lighting direction and shadow logic tend to be more consistent.

  • Greater style adherence — Feeding it examples of your work helps it match tone and mood without over-stylizing.

  • Longer multi-step memory — Edits done in sequence retain earlier changes more consistently.

Where GPT-5 Still Falls Short

Before anyone cancels their Photoshop subscription, GPT-5 has limits worth noting:

  • Not pixel-precise — For high-precision retouching, Photoshop or Lightroom still give more control.

  • Potential for over-processing — Large changes can still introduce invented details or an overly smooth look.

  • No built-in content credentials — You’ll need to add provenance data manually if that’s part of your workflow.

  • Slower image edits — Complex requests may take longer than in GPT-4o or specialized AI tools.

  • Cost considerations — Access to advanced multimodal features may require a higher-tier plan.

Next: Putting GPT-5 to the Test

I gave it a try by asking it to perform a basic editing test. Here is the original photograph, reference image. By the way, we already like this image as-is; the palette change is just for testing purposes.

Already a paid subscriber? We greatly appreciate your support and hope you enjoy the rest of the article.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to AI Photography Training to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jo Ann & George Aiello
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture